Then again, that’s probably how they want it, right? The CIA is duty bound to maintain a high level of secrecy, and hiding things about themselves is something they do very well. They won’t divulge how many employees they have, how big their budget is or they spend the money. Nor do we know, and probably never will, why the collapse of the Soviet Union and the attacks of 9/11 seemingly took them by surprise (or did they?).
We don’t really even know precisely what they do. We just assume they perform some function that is absolutely vital to our security and leave it at that. Without them, we’d become helpless prey to the ruthless hordes of evildoers who are constantly plotting our destruction — Russians, Chinese, Muslim terrorists, Somali pirates, mad dictators, shoe bombers, underwear bombers or any combination of the above, depending on the political needs of the moment. We’d fall into a period of terrible insecurity, such as that which existed between 1776 and 1947 when the CIA didn’t exist at all. Perish the thought. God only knows how we survived those precarious times.
But let’s not revisit bad memories. This is a post about Christmas parties, and apparently our last two CIA directors threw some doozies:
Under then-director Leon E. Panetta last year, the CIA brought in shipments of California wine, and served fried oysters, grilled shrimp and quesadillas. His predecessor, Michael V. Hayden, made sure there were musicians playing Irish music while stations set up inside the agency’s cavernous headquarters hallway served drinks and hors d’oeuvres.And everybody who’s anybody was there. Cool kids only:
At the CIA and DNI, hundreds of guests filed through receiving lines to meet the agencies’ directors. Senior White House officials, lawmakers and journalists all mingled with officials from Washington’s clandestine world.
I could think of many colorful terms to describe Leon Panetta, but party animal wouldn’t be one of them. I figured he was just another revolving door ‘public servant,’ the kind who drifts from one prestigious government job to another as easily and naturally as an octopus gliding through a kelp bed. Turns out he’s something of an epicurean as well. Isn’t that nice? Stuff this one in the file labeled “Austerity for thee, but not for me,” or, for fiscal conservatives, “Wasteful government spending is evil, but some wasteful government spending is less evil than others.”
If it was up to me, the CIA’s party favors would consist of fried SPAM and a keg Old Milwaukee that’s been sitting in the sun all day, as well as a few boxes of chardonnay for those with more sophisticated palates. Maybe several hundred gift wrapped pink slips? An audit, perhaps? Then again, if it was up to me there wouldn’t be any such thing as the CIA, but I’m an idealist.
That that was then. This year they’re planning to scale it back:
But the CIA and DNI both acknowledged this week that the events this time around will be smaller, cheaper and off-limits to the press.Another admission: I didn’t know what the hell the DNI was until after reading this article [Office of the Director of National Intelligence]. I guess I’ve been too busy living life to notice that there was yet another superfluous intelligence agency protecting us from evil. What a bad citizen I am. It’s one more post-9/11 national security contraption that will be probably be with us until the sun explodes, like the U.S.A. Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security. At any rate, they typically blow about fifty grand on their annual Christmas bash, or “roughly the cost of a Hellfire missile,” we’re informed. Thankfully, in the spirit of fiscal responsibility and shared sacrifice, they’re going to spend less than the cost of a Hellfire missile on this year’s office party. That’s mighty big of them, don’t you think?Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the holiday austerity reflects the nation’s financial condition. “Scaling back our holiday celebrations is just another small example of our commitment to making sure that we continue to make wise fiscal decisions across the board,” Clapper said in a prepared statement.
1 comment:
Sorry, but I can't get past the name "Clapper" being in intelligence of any kind. "Hey Clapper, you still on the Crapper?"
Post a Comment